<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blue Fool&#8217;s Into Gold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/</link>
	<description>Covering weekly box office grosses in the US and TV ratings.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skot</title>
		<link>http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/#comment-153931</link>
		<dc:creator>Skot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/#comment-153931</guid>
		<description>Actually, FOOL'S GOLD might be the product of a phenomenon you remarked on a few months ago about genre remakes:

"My remake policy is never redo a classic - always remake a movie that had a great premise but somehow didnâ€™t quite work. That way the premise gets another chance, and only a handful of people are familiar with the original and probably donâ€™t like it anyway. Everybody wins!"

INTO THE BLUE certainly qualifies as a flawed concept. Hot, half-naked young stars and buried treasure are the positives, But overall it was a risible, clichÃ©-ridden caper film that went mostly unseen. Now, Ms. Hudson's and Mr. McConaughey's people thought, if we make it AGAIN as a Romantic Comedy... Katching!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, FOOL&#8217;S GOLD might be the product of a phenomenon you remarked on a few months ago about genre remakes:</p>
<p>&#8220;My remake policy is never redo a classic - always remake a movie that had a great premise but somehow didnâ€™t quite work. That way the premise gets another chance, and only a handful of people are familiar with the original and probably donâ€™t like it anyway. Everybody wins!&#8221;</p>
<p>INTO THE BLUE certainly qualifies as a flawed concept. Hot, half-naked young stars and buried treasure are the positives, But overall it was a risible, clichÃ©-ridden caper film that went mostly unseen. Now, Ms. Hudson&#8217;s and Mr. McConaughey&#8217;s people thought, if we make it AGAIN as a Romantic Comedy&#8230; Katching!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/#comment-153876</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxoffice.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/01/the-blue-fools-into-gold/#comment-153876</guid>
		<description>I see your point - it's like the producers looked at INTO THE BLUE and said "I got it! Depict the couple as TOGETHER! Oh and less blue, more gold! We'll make a fortune!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point - it&#8217;s like the producers looked at INTO THE BLUE and said &#8220;I got it! Depict the couple as TOGETHER! Oh and less blue, more gold! We&#8217;ll make a fortune!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
